Mountain Ungulates of the GYE
Chapter 1: Natural History
Bighorn Sheep
Bovidae family
175-250 lbs Ram
130-190 lbs Ewe
Hooves blunt, widely cleaved
History
Historically 2 million in North America
Numbers decreased
Domestic sheep
Late 1800’s
Forest Service established
Domestic sheep down
Overgrazing concerns
Still down today
Habitat and Diet
The defining feature is closeness to rugged, steep terrain where sheep can escape from predators
Open Country
Long views
Winter in low country or high elevation wind-blown area
Feed on 37 different plant species
Prefer grasses to forbes
Disease and Parasites
Pneumonia
Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae
Fatal pneumonia often develops in bighorn sheep following contact with domestic sheep
Domestic goats also transfer disease
Infectious keratoconjunctivitis
Pinkeye
Contagious ecthyma
Sore mouth
Orf
Mountain Goats
Males 40% heavier than females
190-245 lb Billy
120-160 lb Nanny
Forequarters are well muscled for up-hill climbing in steep terrain
Broad-oval shaped hives
Splay to increase traction when descending steep slopes
Dermal shields- thick skin on their rump to protect from punctures
History
Native to coastal and inland mountain ranges west of the continental divide
Rare until the late 1900’s
Currently 75,000-110,000
Habitat and Diet
Habitat specialists
Increase weight by 38% in summers
Generalist herbivores
Population Dynamics
The greatest limiting factor is extreme weather
First young at 3-4 years old
Twinning is uncommon not rare
Higher among introduced populations
22% annual increase over 12 years in introduced populations
Chapter 2: Historic Information
Original Distribution
Two million bighorn sheep west of the Mississippi
Fossils of mountain goats from 70,000 years ago were found near the Palisades Reservoir
Goats found in GYE up until 10,000-15,000 years ago
1883 ban on hunting in Yellowstone
Influence on native people
Sheep were a staple resource for
Food
Clothing
Glue
Tools
Bows- 60-70 lb pull
Effects of Euro-American Settlement
1860’s and 1870’s - Arrival of prospectors and settlers
Used the Bozeman Trail
1862 Homestead Act
Many settlers in the northern part of the GYE were shepherds from Norway
Market Hunting
Slaughtered tons of bighorn
2,000 sheep taken in the spring of 1875
Tribes struggled
Settlement of their lands
Disease outbreaks
Slaughter of food sources
Sheep Struggled
Suppress fires leading to conifer invading grasslands
1862 Pacific Railway Act
A rapid increase in livestock
1881 <30,000 domestic sheep
1894 >500,000 domestic sheep
1920 ~10 million domestic sheep
Ranchers grazed cattle horses and sheep inside Yellowstone NP from 1875 to 1922
The need for wool during world wars kept sheep going until the 1950s
Livestock grazing led to
Overgrazing
Soil Erosion
Displacement of wildlife
Disease Spread
Most livestock diseases are currently present in wild bighorn sheep
Conservation Efforts
Market hunting, habitat destruction, disease
Replaced by limiting harvests and protecting habitat
Forest Reserve Act 1891
Preserved 6.5 million acres over the first 12 years
National Forest Service 1905
Yellowstone National Park Protection Act 1894
Banned hunting and wildlife harassment
Wilderness Act 1964
Endangered Species Act 1973
Grizzly listed 1975
Domestic sheep grazing is limited to reduce conflict with Grizzly
1978 Absaroka and Beartooths designated wilderness area
1983 only three operations left in these ranges
Vs 110,000 sheep in 1913
2003 last year of grazing in high country
No domestic sheep grazing on federal lands where native populations of bighorn sheep lived in Wyoming by 2017
Relocations
1920’s-1990
1,500 relocations
21,500 sheep
Numbers increased
Began to relocate mountain goats as well
Current Status
50,000 Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep
10-fold decrease from historic numbers
2 fold increase from historic lows
Complicating Factors
Widespread respiratory disease
Habitat loss
High Predation
Human recreational activities
5,600-5,900 Bighorn Sheep in GYE
4,000 in Absaroka and Beartooths alone
Most populations are isolated and fewer than 150 individuals
1,600-2,300 mountain goats
Likely to increase
Non-for profits paid ranchers not to graze on public lands
Removed livestock from 70,000 acres
Conclusions
Bighorn numbers in GYE are still way below pre-settlement conditions
Mountain Goat concerns over impact on native plants, competition, and diseases
Chapter 3: Seasonal Habitat Characteristics
Introduction
Bighorn live in river canyons and on prairie breaks
Goats have expanded into steep canyon regions such as Clarks Fork of the Yellowstone
What is Habitat?
Collection of resources and conditions in an area that allow an animal to survive
Food
Water
Mineral licks
Thermal cover
Shelter from predators
Habitat use varies between males and females and seasonally
Regular fire cycles increase visibility and improve habitat quality
Conducting Habitat Research
Locate animals frequently
Characterize attributes such as
Topography
Vegetation
Cover
Human alteration
Seasonal Habitat Associations
Bighorn Sheep
Breeding
Mid-November- End of January
Segregate by sex after breeding season
Most influential habitat attributes:
Slope
Ruggedness
Elevation
Summer Range
Steep rugged slopes at high elevations
North-northwest facing slopes in summer
Winter Ranges
Low-elevation valley bottoms with less snow
High-elevation residents prefer low-angle windswept plateaus and 35-40-degree slopes that shed snow
South-Southwest facing slopes
Often found on
Terraces
Ledges
Grasslands
Actively avoid dense forests
Isolated, small ledges within steep terrain with good visibility make good birthing and nursery sites
Mountain Goats
Highly dependent on terrain
Need a steep slope angle
Summer ranges average 37*
Minimal canopy cover
Cool northeast aspects in summer and warm southwest aspects in winter
Low-temperature threshold (not heat tolerant)
Birth on isolated ledges
Enough early forage is available on warm aspects within broader rugged landscapes
Avoid predators by avoiding forests
Most socially dominant individuals use preferred bedding sites
Habitat Overlap
Mountain goats were historically absent or scarce in GYE
Bighorns tended to use relatively low elevations compared to goats
Stronger avoidance of forests
Goats winter in steeper habitats than bighorn
Habitats broadly overlap
Habitat attributes may not be limited as habitat is expansive
No evidence of disease transfer in GYE
Documented outside of GYE regularly
Native bighorns are the management's priority
Managing for lower densities of goats
Mineral Licks
Three Types
Dry-earth
Wet muck
Rock faces
Locate mineral licks by looking for
Benches
Abrupt reductions in slope-angle
seeps
Other areas of water deposition
Often found at road cuts
Goats and Bighorn both make lengthy and direct movements to licks located outside of their seasonal ranges
The use of licks peaks in the spring and early summer
Poor winter diets
Accessibility
Males access first
Females peak with birth and lactation
Seeking important minerals
Sodium
Magnesium
Offset high levels of potassium found in spring forage
Stabilize rumen pH
Goats appear to be dominant at licks
Critical sites of disease transfer
Camera traps help us understand their use
Human Disturbance and Habitat Concerns
Deposition and concentration of human urine
Killed a hiker in Olympic NP
2019 removed 300 goats
Cumulative effects of development
Roads
Fences
Housing
Domestic livestock grazing
Skiing
Snowmobile
Ice climbing
Many low-elevation populations no longer have a migration component
Goats live on steep mid-elevation slopes and are less susceptible to human impact
Exotic weeds and conifer encroachment
Reduce forage quality
Reduce habitat quality
Winter recreation in Grand Teton
30% reduction in available habitat
Helicopter noise
Results in impact up to 2 days after a flyover
Climate change
Reduce snow accumulation
Increase access to forage
Increase the frequency of hardened snow events
Chapter 4: Mountain Undulate Migrations
Introduction
Migration- an animal behavior involving repeated seasonal movements of individuals between distinct seasonal ranges, round-trip
Overall these movements benefit the individual
There is a cost to migration but it is always offset by the benefits
Increased survival
Increased reproduction
Primary influences of migratory behavior
Learning
Memory
Social communication
Don’t know the exact cues that signal when to migrate
Both sheep and goats are considered migratory
Exhibit different migratory behaviors/strategies
Bighorns
May travel up to 30 miles
Partially migratory: Some members of the population choose not to migrate
Migration lasts 7-14 days
High-elevation animals make a ‘reverse migration’ in the spring to avoid snow-hardening events
Lambing occurs in late May and early June
Mountain Goats
Considered migratory but
Shorted distance between ranges
Less well-defined movements
Vertical movements
Become solitary
Summer ranges around 9,000 feet
Winter ranges around 6,500 feet
These numbers vary with latitude
Average migration 3 miles over a couple of days
Migratory Diversity
Refers to the proportion of a population that exhibits migratory behaviors
High migratory diversity
Increases the number of seasonal ranges
Buffers from the effects of human disturbances
This leads to greater genetic diversity
Helps with population stability
Low migratory diversity (when all individuals in a population exhibit the same behavior)
Local conditions or disturbances can negatively affect the entire population
Herds have a “Historic Knowledge” of migratory behaviors
Restored populations do not have this knowledge
So far there has been no success in restoring this migratory knowledge
Threats to Migration
Once lost migration is exceedingly hard to restore
Landscape development is the biggest factor leading to loss of migration
Livestock grazing increases the chances of contracting new pathogens
The delicate balance between changing temperatures and foraging conditions at various elevations due to climate change
Conserving migration
Scientists have focused on
Making maps
Larger data sets
Conclusions
Both species have some partially migratory populations
Major threats are posed by
Habitat loss
Human barriers
Climate change
Chapter 5: Genetic Attributes and Research Interests
The Genomics Revolution and Yellowstone
1985 Polymerase chain reaction invented
Thermus aquaticus, a Yellowstone hot spring discovery was instrumental
Taq polymerase was the key that allowed high temp, faster DNA reproduction
What is DNA and how do wildlife biologists use it?
The following all influence wildlife populations
Gene flow
Mutation
Selection
Bighorn genome- 2.9 billion base pairs
Mountain Goat genome- 2.5 billion base pairs
Both are pretty unwieldy
Mitochondrial DNA for both ~16,000 base pairs
DNA from both is relatively similar
Areas of differences called Loci
Ancient Populations
Bighorn have been on the landscape for thousands of years
Important food sources and resources for native peoples
1877 Yellowstone Superintendent’s report
Several thousand bighorns were removed from the area
Mostly for pelts
Major loss of genetic diversity
Exotic respiratory diseases caused a further bottleneck
Exotic pathogens are present in nearly all bighorn populations currently
The genome of the pre-settlement bighorn likely represents the historic condition of the native sheep when their populations were numerous and free of disease
Using old bones we can determine historic population size and health
Using this scientists plan to determine the effects of market hunting and domestic sheep grazing
Also, evaluate how the stability of ewe home ranges might affect how bighorns are related across geographic areas
Evaluating genetic differences between today’s bighorn herds
Many relocations
1,460 translocations
21,500 bighorn
Three introduction methods
Started from distant sources
Supplemented native herds with distant sources
Pure native herds
Use SNP (Snips) to determine how long populations have been separated
SNP’s are pieces of genetic code with repeats (ATATATAT)
ATATAT will be more closely related to an animal with ATAT than AT
These SNP have fairly well-documented mutation rates allowing us to determine separation time
Ovine high-density SNP chip is the preferred site of interest
Determining relatedness within Bighorn Herds
Kinship
Measure of relatedness
A large randomly breeding population would have a mean kinship near zero
Extraordinarily inbred animals approaching 1
Kinship values were consistent with expectations
The highest values were near .064
High but not of concern
Kinship is a helpful piece of information, not a diagnostic device
Mountain Goat Genetic Research
170 goats were released in the GYE at 7 locations north of YNP in the late 1940s and early 1950s and at 2 locations southwest of GTNP in the '60s and '70s
Each location received between 5 and 33 goats
Areas with low numbers introduced experienced significant genetic drift
Geneticists use DNA parts called microsatellites to assess the movements of populations
DNA that is inserted or deleted at random
Always non-coding DNA
Using genetics to assess isolation and sources of nonnative mountain goats in GTNP
Goats were first observed in the late 70’s
Likely transients
Nanny and Kid spotted at Grand Targhee regularly in 2005
Breeding population
In December 2018 biologists counted 88 individuals
The source is likely the Snake River Range 25 miles south
12 goats were introduced in the late 60’s in Palisades, ID
The nearest native goats to the Tetons are 106 miles to the north at Lima Peaks
Genetic analysis of Teton herds shows close relatedness to the Snake River Herd
Chapter 6: Health and Disease
Introduction
Over a century of disease reports in Bighorn in YNP
The earliest is 1880’s
Infections can lead to catastrophic losses
Currently, respiratory diseases already present can affect young lambs
Leading to poor lamb recruitment
Can last for decades after the initial infection
Origin and Transmission of Respiratory Disease
Originated from domestic livestock
New exposures can result from either domestic livestock or other mountain undulates
A complex history of diseases
Psoroptic mange in late 1800’s
Lungworm in 1927
Parasitic nematodes
Commonly thought to lead to secondary infection of pneumonia
Increasingly common in the mid-1900s
Bovine respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza 3 1960’s
Pasteurella bacteria in 1980’s
Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae found in 2008
This can lead to clinical signs of respiratory disease
Does not consistently lead to mortality
Different strains lead to different disease outcomes
Causes unusual changes in sinuses of bighorn
Overgrowth of sinus lining the bone
Sinus tumor
Tumors appear to be infectious
Virus is suspected
2016
Fusobacterium necrophorum
Another important cofactor in the disease state
Current Understanding of Respiratory Disease
Ecological factors at play
Habitat availability
Forage quality
Trace minerals
Population density
Predation
Translocation efforts
Loss of population knowledge
Animal factors
Nutritional state
Immune competence
Respiratory disease in Mountain Goats
Pathogens of bighorns also identified in goats
Lungworm
Mycoplasma
Pasteurella
Sinus tumors
Epidemiology and Similarities to Domestic Disease
Similarities in pathology to “shipping fever” in cattle
The disease is caused by the interaction of primary stressors
Weaning
Shipping
Handling
Nutrition
There are many complex interactions between the agent, host, and environment
History of Respiratory Disease and Outcomes in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
Dies off from pneumonia recorded in the early 1920’s
1,207 dead in 1934
234 dead in 1938
Psoroptic mange die offs in the 1880’s
The steady expansion of mountain goats suggests disease is not a major goat issue
Respiratory Pathogens in Bighorn Sheep and Mountain Goat Populations
Pasteurella bacteria present in all tested populations except the Tetons
The same bacteria have been found in all mountain goat populations except the Teton
Areas with previous exposure have resiliency
Resilience also related to
Habitat availability
Population size
Attenuation (lessening of severity)
Other Diseases and Parasites
Contagious ecthyma
Orf
Soremouth or Scab mouth
Sporadic mortality
Zoonotic disease
Keratoconjunctivitis
Pinkeye
Low mortality
Cloudy or milky eyes
Cause by Chlamydia sp. Bacteria
1980s die off of 60% (300 of 500 animals)
Bluetongue virus
Anaplasmosis
Johne’s disease
Malignant catarrhal fever
Bovine viral diarrhea
Necrobacillosis
Numerous internal parasites
Assessing Nutritional and Physiological Status
Chapter 7: Populations Dynamics
Introduction
We notice and appreciate individual animals while wildlife watching
Conservation and management focus on populations
Difficulties defining populations
Biologists conduct surveys to assess “how well a population is doing”
Stable, increasing, decreasing
Population stability is a function of reproduction, survival, and movement
Metapopulations are an interacting set of subpopulations
This is the ideal
There are 16 recognized subpopulations in the GYE
The largest metapopulation in the eastern Absaroka range
Another metapopulation in northwest Yellowstone
The Upper Yellowstone Complex
Identifying mountain goat populations is even more difficult
Limited data
Highly restricted home ranges
Agencies also track the age and sex of all harvested animals
Radio-collared adults are used to access pregnancy and mortality rates
Reproduction
The breeding season for bighorns is mid-November through mid-December
Breeding coincides with peak conditions for both species
Annual pregnancy rates for bighorn 87-95%
No pregnancy rates for GYE goats exist
Canadian numbers suggest a similar percentage
Both Bighorn and Goats are polygamous
Mature bighorn rams are 40% larger than ewes
175-250 Rams
130-190 Ewes
Similar for goats
190-245 Billy
120-160 Nanny
Bighorn rams participate in head-on-head ritual combat
Mountain goat billies use their horns to attempt to strike their opponents on the flank or rump
Serious wounds are rare but punctures and slashes are common
Males have thick dermal shields .6-.9 inches thick
Gestation for both is approximately 6 months (170-180 days)
Females usually separate from the herd
Seek out isolated locations in rugged terrain
Seclude for several days to a week
Single lambs most commonly twinning rare
Goats have had more common twins and even triplets reported
Twinning frequency is an index of the relative quality and quantity of forage available on the summer range
Young typically weigh between 7 and 9 pounds
Nursery herds can exceed 50 animals
Lambs and Kids begin eating vegetation around 3 weeks
Weaning occurs between late July and September
Young are independent by spring
Social bonds with bighorns last until the spring but goats often continue into the next year
Survival rates and the causes of mortality
Survival is the probability that an animal alive at the start of some defined period of time will still be alive at the end of the time period
Survival varies based on age
Low survival during the first year of life, rapidly increases to maximum then wanes in old age.
The major mechanism responsible for the decline in survival is tooth wear
Much of an ungulates time is spent eating
Plants are abrasive because of their structure and chemical composition and due to fine soils that stick to their surface
Survival rates differ by sex
Males tend to live shorter lives than females
Bighorn sheep abundance is particularly sensitive to the survival of adult females
Average survival for females is 80-93%
Mountain goat survival is slightly lower 86-80%
This is likely due to the inclusion of males
Sources of mortality
Mountain lions, wolves, grizzly bears, black bears, coyotes, golden eagles, accidents (falls from a cliff), avalanches, vehicle collisions, disease, long or deep snowpack, hunting (2-4%)
Recruitment
‘Birth Pulse’ causes a dramatic increase in population size all at once
A large portion of young die before their first birthday
Biologists regularly collect information on recruitment via aerial surveys
Recruitment rate is the ratio of young-of-the-year to adult females
Kid to adult ratio
Expressed as a decimal or percentage
Recruitment rates tend to be much lower than survival rates and vary widely
GYE recruitment typically varies between 19 and 41%
Typically 80% of females are pregnant in a given year
Meaning between 50% and 75% of young die in a given year
Recruitment under 20% is considered not sustainable
Dispersal
Reasons for dispersal
Leave and settle in new areas
Some animals are just wanderers
Some searching for important resources
Food
Mates
Social tension
Goats tend to be more exploratory
Bighorns demonstrate less tendency to disperse
Remain in same local despite increasing densities
Particularly in populations that are reintroduced
Taylor-Hilgard population
Increased population size
Little expansion into adjacent high-quality territory
Become increasingly vulnerable to predation and disease
Abundance and Population Trends
Everyone wants to know
How many animals are in the population?
How has the population changed over time?
Questions are challenging to answer accurately
Large complex landscapes
Distributions change dramatically with variables
Food quality
Food quantity
Snowpack
Predators
These animals tend to exist in small groups and are easily hidden by rugged terrain
Population surveys likely detect 60-80% of animals
5,700-5,900 Bighorn Sheep
1,700-2,400 Goats in GYE
Bighorn sheep conservation success story!
Most bighorn in the west were extirpated
1,000,000 sheep to less than 25,000
2016 50,000 animals in the west
Restricted in range
The result of 1,400 translocations with 25,000 animals
GYE has the largest continuous distribution of bighorn sheep in North America
Mountain goats have become widely distributed and well-established
The result of introductions
Populations are starting to stabilize in some areas
Continues to increase in the GYE
Areas of concern are the Absaroka and Teton ranges
Chapter 8: Impacts of Expanding Introduced Mountain Goats
Range Expansion
In one human lifetime, goats have expanded from 0 to 2,355 individuals (2014)
Done through 157 relocations
Goat to increase big game hunting
40s-70s
YNP count
24 in 1997
178 in 2009
209 in 2014
Aptitude to disperse across unsuitable habitats
Considered non-native
Compete for forage and space
Negative impacts on disease transmission and plant communities
Range Overlap with Native Bighorn Sheep
Use similar habitats and share native ranges outside of GYE
Differ in selection of seasonal home ranges, habitat types, and food
Potential for substantial negative impacts on bighorn populations
Competition for limited resources via aggressive displacement
100 interactions
37% bighorn were deterred from resource acquisition
Must wait to utilize salt licks
Strong overlap in forage resources in winter
Goats prefer forbs and bighorns prefer grasses
30% overlap in feeding sites
Differ in preferences for slope, canopy cover, and elevations
Differences not strong enough to cut spatial overlap
Reason to believe that goats will adversely affect bighorn sheep once they completely colonize a given habitat
Potential Impacts to Native Plant Communities
Native plants are sensitive to
Bedding
Grazing
Trailing
Wallowing
Documented declines in alpine and subalpine plant cover
Increased bare soil
Altered rates of nitrogen cycling
YNP study found damage was restricted to the tops of ridge lines
Hypothesized that YNP has resilience from grazing of bighorn, marmots, etc
Bighorns never present in Olympic NP
Potential for Continued Range Expansion
High kid-to-adult ratios
Currently occupy 43% of previously unoccupied areas
Carrying capacity 5,300-8,850 goats
The limiting factor is winter ranges and competition
75% of current sheep ranges fall within the parameters for suitable goat habitat
Colonization of GTNP
First observed in 1970s
Concentrated between cascade and Snowshoe Canyons
Rapidly growing
Can support 250-400 goats
2.5-4 times pre eradication numbers
Complexities of Managing Mountain Goats
Multiple federal and state jurisdictions
Each has different goals, missions, and mandates
67% Federal Lands
48% Forest Service
11% Park Service
7% BLM
27% Private Lands
4.2% State
1.8% Tribal
States typically manage for conservative harvest and discouragement of further range expansion
USFS classifies bighorn as a sensitive species
Requires special habitat conditions to be preserved
Park Service's goals are to conserve native species and communities
Wyoming Game and Fish achieve goat objectives by hunting in the Absorkas
It has proven less effective in the Teton Range
The number of Goats in the Tetons is relatively low and therefore preventing further expansion of goats would involve the removal of fewer animals which may be more socially acceptable and reasonable to fund
Future management of Mountain Goats
Populations of bighorn sheep in the Teton Range is especially sensitive due to their constricted range, small size, unique genetics, behavioral adaptations, and susceptibility to pneumonia-causing pathogens
Absaroka population is the largest, most robust with 4,000 animals
85% of rocky mountain bighorns reside in Wyoming
There is a liberal mountain goat hunting season in the Absaroka Ranges
Translocations of over 21,500 bighorn sheep resulted in populations of only 50,000 animals
A significant portion of bighorn occupy high-elevation winter ranges
The delicate interplay of dry, wind-blown, snow-free ridges that exist through mid-late winter
Increasing temperatures in high elevations disrupt the freeze-thaw cycles
Renders forages unavailable
Pathogen transmission risk persists
Conclusions
Manages intentionally introduced goats in the 1950s-1970’s to provide hunting and viewing opportunities
Goats have grown to occupy over 43% of viable habitat
Competition and disease transmission are the biggest threats to bighorn populations
2,000 goats currently, possibility over 9,000 goats
Near certain to have adverse impacts on 6,000 sheep currently in the GYE
Goats perfectly suited for the mountainous habitat of GYE
There is no single solution
Chapter 9: Current Management
Jurisdictions and Mandates
North American Model of Wildlife Management tenet that the public owns wildlife
Management activities
Habitat enhancement
Hunting
Landowner agreements
NPS Policy
Hands off
Allow populations to fluctuate in response to forage, predation, weather, and competition
Hunting was prohibited in 1894 in National Parks
The policy recommends the management of non-native species that interfere with the native wildlife or their habitats, up to and including eradication, if such control is prudent and feasible
All managers have the shared goal of conserving, recovering, maintaining the public trust, reducing property damage, increasing human safety, and doing so by basing our decisions on reliable information
Population Management
Broadly defined as the process of dealing with or controlling things or people
Adaptive management
Often used due to unpredictable environmental variation, difficulties collecting data, and the need to make assumptions
The continual process of evaluation and adjustment includes determining an objective, applying a management action, measuring progress toward achieving the objective, and adjusting subsequent management actions
Hunting is the primary tool used to meet population objectives in both goats and sheep
Bighorn hunting centers around the take of adult males
Montana has a ewe hunting season in specific areas
Maintain lower densities in specific areas
Often related to winter forage availability in specific areas
Minimize the risk of disease outbreak
Either sex of mountain goats is often allowed as sex is difficult to determine
Capture and relocation is another control method
Drop nets, corral traps, chemical immobilization, aerial net-gunning
1989-1997 46 mountain goats were removed from the Snake River Range
Habitat Management
Maintain habitats for native species and, in some cases desirable non-native species
Management of oil and gas development, road-building, timber harvesting, livestock grazing, and recreation
Enhance habitat with prescribed fire, managed wildfires, timber harvest, herbicide treatments
Sheep are grazers and thus prefer high visibility so fire and mechanical treatments that remove vision-obstructing trees and shrubs and increase the production of preferred forage grasses are beneficial
Removal of undesirable weeds like cheatgrass
Disease Management
Buy-outs of sheep ranches and ranching permits
Primarily benefiting bighorn sheep such buy-outs have helped individuals permitted to experience depredations from recovered large carnivores such as bears and wolves
Often controversial and often litigated
Wildlife agencies may cull individuals showing signs of diseases such as pneumonia
Removal of Bighorn sheep observed commingling with domestic sheep or goats
“Stray Livestock” statute in Wyoming
Protocol for removing such animals if they pose a disease risk
Wyoming “Statewide Bighorn Sheep-Domestic Sheep Interaction Plan
Prioritizes the state bighorn sheep herds with respect to their origin and importance, with native herds receiving the highest respect for their origin and importance, with core native herds receiving the highest level of protection, and translocated herds receiving less emphasis
Identification and removal of chronically infected pathogen “carriers”
Vaccines are problematic as they inhabit high-elevation habitat
May eventually become more feasible
Funding
Federal funding from congressionally appropriated tax dollars
State hunting licenses and Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act
Pittman-Robertson Act- Tax on arms and ammunition used to fund wildlife surveys and research, acquisition, and improvement of wildlife habitat, translocations, development of public access, and hunter safety programs
State funding is limited as agency revenues generated by hunting license sales do not cover the cost of annual population and disease monitoring
Mule deer and Elk dollars often subsidize the mountain ungulate costs
Governors Tags and Special auctions, single sheep for as much as $480,000
10,000-15,000 more typical in Wyoming
Money donated to agencies such as “The Wild Sheep Foundation” or Rocky Mountain Goat Alliance
Bighorn Sheep Management
Focus on re-establishment
10,000 (1960) - 50,000 (2017)
1,500 Translocations
21,500 Sheep
Typically one release site
Low-elevation winter range
Accessibility
Ease of capture
Leaves populations vulnerable
50% of sheep populations have fewer than 100 individuals
Recent focus on geographically distributed metapopulations
Connected suitable habitats
A broad range of behavioral traits
Migration strategies
Promotes resilience
“Portfolio effect”
Montana is attempting to create metapopulations
Translocating individuals very close to familiar territory
Retain local knowledge
No pathogen risks
Along the Madison River
Some success in creating more viewing and hunting opportunities
95% of visitors participate in wildlife viewing
15,640 Jobs
1.5 Million in economy
Geyser viewing (87%)
Hiking (39%)
Camping (27%)
Fishing (13%)
400 Hunting opportunities per year in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming
350 Rams taken
158 from GYE
50,000 people apply
Compares to 80,000 elk harvested each year
Mountain Goat Management
Generally considered non-native species
17 Translocations
157 Mountain goats
14 in Montana
3 in Idaho
The current population of 2,100 Goats
Goats more successful translocations
15:1 Return on goats
2:1 on sheep
Hunted to “discourage expansion”
Capacity for 5,400-8,900 goats in GYE
Unlikely that there could be this many goats and not adversely affect 6,000 bighorn
NPS allows for: “Removal of non-native species that interfere with native wildlife or habitats if such control is prudent and feasible” (2016)
Rocky Mountain National Park and Dinosaur National Monument remove goats when they are detected
Olympic National Park removed all goats from the park
Goats in the Tetons
Brought to Snake River Range between 1969 and 1971
Observed on Teton Pass in 1977
First in Grand Teton in 1979
Sporadic sightings until 2008 when a breeding population arose
Numbers have increased dramatically since 2008
Surpassed bighorn numbers in 2018 (100 goats)
Highest Priority Sheep Herds
Winds
Gros Ventre
Absaroka
Hoback
Tetons
Teton sheep confined to high elevation winter range (8,500)
Once migratory
Fire suppression
Domestic grazing
Conifer encroachment
Teton sheep naive to goat pathogens
Absaroka sheep already share all known pathogens with goats
Beartooth and Snake River ranges continue to be managed for a robust goat population
Liberal hunting to control expansion
Odds of draw ~1%
30/year in Wyoming
46/year in Idaho
180/year in Montana
161/year from GYE
86% of the harvest from introduced populations
Opposite of 50 years ago
Conclusion
Maintaining robust metapopulations of bighorn sheep where they exist is undoubtedly the best approach to the persistence of bighorn sheep on the landscape
Recreating metapopulations is not easily achieved